SO Assessment Workflow (End‑to‑End)
From assigning assessment activities to instructors → collecting evidence → reporting results → closing the loop (CQI).
Workflow steps
| # | Step | Owner | Output / Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Define SO→PI→Rubric (per SO) | Assessment Committee | PI dictionary + rubrics + targets |
| 2 | Select assessment points (courses & tasks) | Program Coordinator | Assessment plan matrix (SO × course × method) |
| 3 | Assign assessors (instructors) + brief | Program Coordinator | Assignment memo + training record |
| 4 | Implement in courses (tasks + rubrics) | Course Instructor | Moodle activities with linked rubrics |
| 5 | Collect direct evidence (samples + rubric scores) | Course Instructor | Gradebook exports; student samples; moderation notes |
| 6 | Analyze results (attainment) | Assessment Committee | Attainment charts; PI‑level gaps |
| 7 | Decide CQI actions (close‑the‑loop) | Program Committee | Action plan with responsibilities + dates |
| 8 | Report (semester + annual) | Program Coordinator | SO report; CQI log; evidence index |
| 9 | Verify implementation of actions | Quality office / Chair | Follow‑up review; updated results next cycle |
Direct assessment checklist
Progress:
Indirect assessment examples
Use indirect measures to complement direct evidence (never to replace it).
- Course feedback on SO coverage (per course)
- Exit survey (graduating students)
- Internship / capstone sponsor feedback
- Alumni survey (1–3 years after graduation)
- Employer / Industry Advisory Board input
Close‑the‑Loop (CQI) in one screen
Trigger: SO attainment below target or PI reveals a skill gap → Decision: action(s) chosen → Implementation: responsible + timeline → Verification: next cycle results.